Judges at this hearing office vary in approval rates and decision volume. Select a judge to view individual statistics.
(Judge-level statistics reflect the most recent fiscal year with available data.
Approval rates may vary over time and by case type.)
| Judge Name | Approval Rate | Compared to Office Average | Decision Count | Data Recency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April M Wexler | 0% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 1 | 2019 |
| Sean P Walsh | 0% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 0 | — |
| Amita B Tracy | 41% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 241 | 2012 |
| Ronald J Thomas | 43% | Near (office avg. 44%) | 4,208 | 2025 |
| Pedro Tejada-Rivera | 0% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 0 | — |
| Edward M Starr | 0% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 1 | 2011 |
| Carol A Sax | 0% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 1 | 2011 |
| Ronald S Robins | 100% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 1 | 2011 |
| William R Paxton | 100% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 1 | 2011 |
| Aaron M Morgan | 25% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 4 | 2020 |
| John T Molleur | 31% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 398 | 2025 |
| Glenn G Meyers | 100% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 1 | 2011 |
| Roy P Liberman | 62% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 1,684 | 2013 |
| Matthew Kuperstein | 41% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 2,446 | 2025 |
| Deirdre R Horton | 48% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 4,638 | 2020 |
| Brien Horan | 44% | Near (office avg. 44%) | 531 | 2020 |
| I. K Harrington | 43% | Near (office avg. 44%) | 2,145 | 2025 |
| Lisa Groeneveld-Meijer | 49% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 1,138 | 2014 |
| Robert Droker | 100% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 1 | 2011 |
| Robert A DiBiccaro | 58% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 3,455 | 2017 |
| Yvette N Diamond | 62% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 63 | 2012 |
| Manuel del Valle | 100% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 2 | 2011 |
| Eileen Burlison | 38% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 1,003 | 2011 |
| Eskunder Boyd | 47% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 2,428 | 2025 |
| Alexander P Borre | 0% | Below (office avg. 44%) | 0 | — |
| Ryan A Alger | 64% | Above (office avg. 44%) | 753 | 2011 |
These statistics provide additional context about how cases are processed at this hearing office.
They reflect system-level activity, not individual judge decision behavior, and may vary based on administrative and procedural factors.