Judges at this hearing office vary in approval rates and decision volume. Select a judge to view individual statistics.
(Judge-level statistics reflect the most recent fiscal year with available data.
Approval rates may vary over time and by case type.)
| Judge Name | Approval Rate | Compared to Office Average | Decision Count | Data Recency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| II Gabbard Doug | 30% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 348 | 2020 |
| Thomas J Wheeler | 26% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 47 | 2016 |
| Toni White - Bogan | 0% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 0 | — |
| Edmund C Werre | 11% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 18 | 2012 |
| Douglas S. Stults | 0% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1 | 2014 |
| Bernard Porter | 32% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1,030 | 2015 |
| Kim D. Parrish | 57% | Above (office avg. 45%) | 7 | 2011 |
| Glenn A Neel | 54% | Above (office avg. 45%) | 268 | 2010 |
| Robert M Mcphail | 0% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1 | 2014 |
| Michael Mannes | 33% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1,342 | 2025 |
| James Linehan | 39% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1,222 | 2018 |
| Michael A Kirkpatrick | 55% | Above (office avg. 45%) | 1,414 | 2012 |
| Monica D Jackson | 0% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1 | 2020 |
| Renee B Hagler | 0% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1 | 2020 |
| David Gutierrez | 52% | Above (office avg. 45%) | 138 | 2012 |
| David R Gutierrez | 38% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 8 | 2013 |
| J. Frederick Gatzke | 39% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 636 | 2015 |
| II Gabbard | 31% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 3,754 | 2019 |
| David W Engel | 63% | Above (office avg. 45%) | 56 | 2025 |
| Deirdre O Dexter | 44% | Near (office avg. 45%) | 495 | 2016 |
| Osly F. Deramus | 38% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 1,739 | 2013 |
| Daniel Curran | 77% | Above (office avg. 45%) | 22 | 2011 |
| W. Thomas Bundy | 31% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 179 | 2012 |
| J. Leland Bentley | 42% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 993 | 2025 |
| James Bentley | 39% | Below (office avg. 45%) | 2,819 | 2018 |
| Trace Baldwin | 51% | Above (office avg. 45%) | 1,140 | 2013 |
These statistics provide additional context about how cases are processed at this hearing office.
They reflect system-level activity, not individual judge decision behavior, and may vary based on administrative and procedural factors.